shwedka писал(а):
Сорокин ВикторВ седьмой раз напоминаю о положительных отзывах. Признайтесь же, наконец, что Вы их придумали для красного словца!!!
Sujet : Re: LettreDate : 24/01/00 18:49:22 Paris, Madrid<BR>
From: @uswest.com (S. A.)<BR>
To:
RSorokine@aol.com (Victor Sorokin)<BR>
I have finally had time this weekend to review everything you have<BR>
sent me concerning your proof of FLT. I enjoyed working through it and<BR>
could not find anything wrong with it. I recieved your note concerning<BR>
publishing your proof in IJAM. They require it to be written in<BR>
English. If I can be of assistance please let me know.<BR>
<BR>
Thank you and good luck,<BR>
S. A.<BR>
=====
Date : 18/02/00 10:17:56 Paris, Madrid<BR>
From: @cs.cas.cz (L. A.)<BR>
To:
RSorokine@aol.com<BR>
</FONT><FONT SIZE=3 PTSIZE=10><BR>
</FONT><FONT SIZE=3 PTSIZE=10>Dear Sorokine:<BR>
In fact thank you very much for your interesting and probably <BR>
fascinating work you informed me about the last time. There is a <BR>
high probability you "rediscovered" a wit hint made by Fermat!? A <BR>
point seems to be just thinking in prime numbers base ...as you <BR>
stressed. But it is not easy to enter this game. On the other side I <BR>
have not been able to find any principal faults in your PROOF.<BR>
My congratulations! It's a strong intelectual achievement!<BR>
Please go ahead! And I will appreciate a continuation of <BR>
communication. Please send me anything you do in this matter.<BR>
My regards,<BR>
====
From: @mitre.org (M. B.)<BR>
To:
RSorokine@aol.com<BR>
</FONT><FONT SIZE=3 PTSIZE=10><BR>
</FONT><FONT SIZE=3 PTSIZE=10>> As I didn't hear from you for some time, <BR>
...<BR>
> Your opinion is always valuable to me.<BR>
I will be travelling for a few weeks.<BR>
I see that you are filling in some of the gaps, giving some of the<BR>
definitions, and some of the references. That is very good. <BR>
<BR>
In mid-March I will get back from my vacation. Perhaps you will have<BR>
the entire paper compiled. I will have time to read it then. I will<BR>
also have time to read Ian Kimming's remarks and your response at<BR>
that time, when the whole thing is fully written out. Then I hope to<BR>
give you some good comments.<BR>
<BR>
Good Luck,<BR>
<BR>
Dr. M. B.<BR>
====
Date : 15/01/00 09:43:05 Paris, Madrid<BR>
From: @birzeit.edu<BR>
To:
RSorokine@aol.com<BR>
</FONT><FONT SIZE=3 PTSIZE=10><BR>
</FONT><FONT SIZE=3 PTSIZE=10>Dear Sorokine,<BR>
It seems that you really Succeeded in reading FERMAT MIND. I <BR>
could not find any error in your PROOF. I do like your last version <BR>
of the proof without using the LEMMA. <BR>
CONGRATULATION !!!<BR>
Best<BR>
A. B.<BR>
Birzeit University<BR>
West Bank, Palestine, via Israel.<BR>
====
From: @birzeit.edu<BR>
To:
RSorokine@aol.com<BR>
</FONT><FONT SIZE=3 PTSIZE=10><BR>
</FONT><FONT SIZE=3 PTSIZE=10>Dear Sorokine,<BR>
It seems that you really Succeeded in reading FERMAT MIND. I <BR>
could not find any error in your PROOF. I do like your last version <BR>
of the proof without using the LEMMA. <BR>
CONGRATULATION !!!<BR>
Best<BR>
A. B.<BR>
Birzeit University<BR>
West Bank, Palestine, via Israel.<BR>
====
From: @birzeit.edu<BR>
To:
RSorokine@aol.com<BR>
</FONT><FONT SIZE=3 PTSIZE=10><BR>
</FONT><FONT SIZE=3 PTSIZE=10>Dear Sorokine,<BR>
Congratulation once again. I am JUST SURPRISED that you <BR>
are going to publish it in this JOURNAL. I am not saying it is a bad <BR>
JOURNAL. BUT I thought it will fit better in Journal of Number <BR>
Theory. <BR>
Best<BR>
Ayman<BR>
One should not aim at being possible to understand, but <BR>
at being impossible to misunderstand <BR>
<BR>
Dr. A. B.<BR>
Dept. of Mathematics and computer science<BR>
Birzeit University<BR>
P.O. Box 14<BR>
=====
Date : 19/02/00 08:16:41 Paris, Madrid
From: @birzeit.edu
To:
RSorokine@aol.com
Dear Sorokine,
First,The proof you gave to FERMAT LAST THEOREM is very
elementary but at the same time... it was not an easything to read.
I did not find any error in the proof. However, some people claim
that they have found errors in your proof. Since number theory is
not my MAIN RESEARCH AREA ( I am in COMMUTATIVE RING
THEORY), it is possible that I myself made an error by claiming
that your proof in CORRECT. So, I think only SPECIALIST in
NUMBER THEORY can say to both of us whether we both
WRONG or we BOTH Correct. I still believe that you do have a
proof....
Best
A.
Augustine Wrote : " He good Christian should beware
of Mathematicians and all who make empty prophesis.
The danger already exists that Mathematicians have made
a covenant with the devil to darken the spirit and
to confine Man in the bonds of Hell."
A. B. Wrote (July, 17, 94): He Good Human should
beware of politicians and all who make empty promises.
The danger already exists that politicians have made
a covenant with lawyers to mislead human-beings and
to confine Man in the bonds of darkness.
=======
Date : 12/01/00 11:19:21 Paris, Madrid<BR>
From: @alg.mat.ucm.es (O. R. C.)<BR>
To:
RSorokine@aol.com<BR>
Madrid, 12-I-00<BR>
<BR>
Dear Sorokine!<BR>
<BR>
Having read your work, I cannot find any point which could leave to a<BR>
controversy. Certainly I'm not an expert in number theory, but all seems<BR>
to be perfectly in order. The result is extremely surprising and I'm<BR>
atonished how you have comprised it so "easily".<BR>
<BR>
Sincerely..<BR>
O. R.<BR>
=====
Date : 16/02/00 11:30:27 Paris, Madrid<BR>
From: @alg.mat.ucm.es (O. R. C.)<BR>
To:
RSorokine@aol.com<BR>
</FONT><FONT SIZE=3 PTSIZE=10><BR>
</FONT><FONT SIZE=3 PTSIZE=10><BR>
Dear Victor!<BR>
The reason for which you haven't had any notice from me was of technical<BR>
nature, but not about your work; I had problems with the computer net.<BR>
<BR>
I have read your proofs and the objections. If there is a mistake, I do<BR>
not recognize it. I do not have any arguments to refuse your results.<BR>
By the way I am not only a nonspecialist in number theory, I am neither an<BR>
authority. Thus I can give you my personal opinion and wonder about your<BR>
dedication, but I can't give you global recognising of it.<BR>
Peharps you should talk to the great specialists on the item; I don't know<BR>
any of them, but their references are superb:<BR>
<BR>
1. _.Edwards [ he wrote a book on the theorem, G.T.M 50, Springer Verlag]<BR>
<BR>
2. N.Koblitz, another number theorician<BR>
<BR>
3.J.P.Serre; I don't know if he has done something specifically on the<BR>
theorem, but he is an oblied reference for anyone.<BR>
<BR>
Their addresses should not be difficult to become using the search for<BR>
members in the A.M.S web-page.<BR>
<BR>
If there is anything I can do for you, please ask me.<BR>
<BR>
Sincerely..<BR>
O. R.<BR>
=====
Date : 11/01/00 17:15:32 Paris, Madrid<BR>
From: @takinfo.matav.hu (H. G.)<BR>
To:
RSorokine@aol.com<BR>
</FONT><FONT SIZE=3 PTSIZE=10><BR>
</FONT><FONT SIZE=3 PTSIZE=10>Dear Victor!<BR>
<BR>
I have read some previous versions of your proof and found it <BR>
correct. I wrote it you 4. Jan 2000. You made it more and more <BR>
elegant, added new details for more variables etc. I am happy to know <BR>
about your new results.<BR>
<BR>
Thank you.<BR>
<BR>
G.<BR>
=====
Date : 23/01/00 16:43:31 Paris, Madrid<BR>
From: @cybertours.com (B. H.)<BR>
To:
RSorokine@aol.com<BR>
Congratulations upon being invited to present your FLT to the IJAM<BR>
journal. And also, thank you for sending your proofs to me. My main<BR>
interest is in the mathematics of music that involves the Pythagorean<BR>
formula, therefore I can relate to your work and find it interesting that<BR>
you use n as prime. All of the prime numbers form a microtonal musical<BR>
scale.<BR>
<BR>
Thanks again,<BR>
B. H.<BR>
=====
Date : 15/02/00 21:01:49 Paris, Madrid<BR>
From: @arete.com (j. h.)<BR>
To:
RSorokine@aol.com<BR>
</FONT><FONT SIZE=3 PTSIZE=10><BR>
</FONT><FONT SIZE=3 PTSIZE=10>Dear Dr. Sorokine:<BR>
<BR>
Please send me a copy in English of your one page proof of FLT. I<BR>
received notice of your work from Professor Jean Pedersen of Santa Clara<BR>
University.<BR>
<BR>
Thank you,<BR>
<BR>
J. R. H. Ph.D<BR>
=====
Date : 04/02/00 07:12:43 Paris, Madrid<BR>
From: @math.byu.edu (J. L.)<BR>
To:
VSorokine@Bigfoot.com<BR>
</FONT><FONT SIZE=3 PTSIZE=10><BR>
</FONT><FONT SIZE=3 PTSIZE=10>Dear Victor<BR>
My friend and I have looked at your work and have not found any glaring<BR>
problems.<BR>
It seems that your ideas fit together beautifully but we are going to<BR>
use this<BR>
coming weekend to go through it again. Our general concensus is that if<BR>
Fermat did<BR>
have a proof it would have looked similar to yours!<BR>
Are you a mathematician or are you, like Fermat, an enthusiast? Also I<BR>
would be<BR>
interested to know where you got my name from.<BR>
Thankyou for involving me in your work<BR>
J. L.<BR>
=====
Date : 22/01/00 12:47:14 Paris, Madrid<BR>
From: @mail.bip.net (T.)<BR>
To:
RSorokine@aol.com<BR>
</FONT><FONT SIZE=3 PTSIZE=10><BR>
</FONT><FONT SIZE=3 PTSIZE=10>Dear Mr. Sorokine,<BR>
<BR>
I must say that I am impressed. I am not any kind of Maths specialist, being<BR>
more an interested amateur and, probably a skilled one, but I couldn't find<BR>
any "bug" in your proof.<BR>
One thing, I could not find anything about yourself, even your homepage is<BR>
not a valid one. So who are you, if don't mind? Who I am you can find in<BR>
CML.<BR>
All the best.<BR>
T. C.<BR>